|
- 4th Quarter 1997 -
This is a short excerpt taken from the actual TWC information letter
for 4th Quarter 1997 Click
here to read full version.
"CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS
Many employer inquiries to our office involve the issue of criminal background
checks. Due to the fear of negligent hiring and negligent retention, more and
more businesses are interested in obtaining criminal history information about
their applicants or current employees. The negligent hiring issue centers around
a legal theory that holds employers liable for the criminal behavior of their
employees. Essentially, negligent hiring begins when an employer hires an applicant
without checking out that individual's criminal history. The employee then engages
in criminal behavior toward a coworker, customer, or other third party. A subsequent
investigation demonstrates that the employee had a criminal history that was
similar in nature to behavior they directed toward the third party. The injured
party sues the employer, arguing that the injury to them would never have occurred
if the employer had inquired about the applicant's criminal past (because such
an inquiry would have caused the employer to not hire the applicant).
In the past, it was quite difficult and expensive to obtain criminal
history information because the Department of Public Safety (DPS) would not
release such data without the express written consent of the applicant. Without
that consent, the employer was required to perform a county by county check
of criminal records. Since there are more than 250 counties in Texas, this placed
considerable administrative and financial burdens on the business community.
Fortunately, these problems were reduced this year by the Texas Legislature
in House
Bill 1176. HB
1176 states that any person is entitled to obtain criminal history information
for convictions involving any criminal offense and deferred adjudication information
on a person charged with a felony offense. Thus, all criminal convictions and
felony offenses resulting in a grant of deferred adjudication can be obtained.
A small administrative fee will be charged. The fee is
only $1.00 if the request is submitted electronically or by magnetic media.
Further information about the law and its requirements can be obtained from
the DPS Crime Records Division, which has its headquarters in Austin.
Although it is now easier to obtain criminal record information from applicants
and employees, an employer should still exercise some caution in this area.
For example, anti-discrimination laws could be used to attack an employer whose
use of criminal history information arbitrarily and disproportionately excludes
members of protected minority groups from possible employment (disparate impact
argument). For this reason, employers would be wise not to use criminal history
information as a complete bar to employment. If challenged, employers should
be able to demonstrate that the criminal inquiry was job-related and consistent
with business necessity. For example, it would be appropriate for an employer
to exclude an applicant for a driving position who had a recent DWI or DUI conviction.
On the other hand, a prior DWI conviction would probably not be job-related
with respect to a clerical position. Employers should also be aware that the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has taken the position that disparate
impact discrimination arguments could also be raised by protected minorities
who were excluded from employment on the basis of arrest records. This position
is based on the assumption that certain minority groups are arrested in a higher
proportion than the general population because of prejudice or discrimination
in the criminal justice system. "
On top of that the 7 years law was eliminated by Bill Clinton. Another thing
that employers use against Deferred Adjudication is the FCRA
which was amended in 1996. However, Congress passed the `Consumer Reporting
Employment Clarification Act of 1998' and it was signed into law by the President
on November 2, 1998. It specifically, strikes FCRA Section
605(a)(5), thus removing the limitation on the look-back period for criminal
conviction histories. There is no more seven years law. This would have been
an automatic relief given to people who had deferred adjudication.
|